Aportes desde las Ciencias de la Administración a la Propiedad Intelectual
Keywords:
Ciencias de la administración, Propiedad IntelectualSynopsis
En esta investigación se prioriza el tema de la Propiedad Intelectual vinculada con el conocimiento susceptible de protección por alguna figura de la propiedad intelectual, en relación con la innovación, la competitividad, el capital intelectual de las organizaciones, el reto con las universidades en la transferencia de tecnología. La presente obra fue realizada por estudiantes del Doctorado de ciencias de la administración, quienes vincularon su línea de investigación con la propiedad intelectual.
El sector económico busca que sus procesos sean innovadores y competitivos, para que tengan un valor para su entorno y crear ventajas competitivas y ser mas eficientes.
La propiedad intangible ha creado nuevas fuentes de conocimiento, nuevas inversiones extranjeras y ha sido un detonador en el progreso eco- nómico empresarial.
La construcción de nueva tecnología, se encamina con la innovación y el desarrollo, con nuevas estrategias cuyo valor académico es un aporte en la creación de nuevo conocimiento.
Esta obra bilingüe aporta en el conocimiento y crea nuevos paradigmas con un enfoque diversificado y estratégico para la deconstrucción de nuevas líneas de investigación.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Allred, B.B.,Park,W.G.,2007.The influence of patent protection on firm inno- vation investment in manufacturingindustries. J.Int.Manag.13,91–109.
Bessen, J.,Maskin,E.,2009.Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. RAND J. Econ.40,611– 635.
Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and ena- blers of supplychain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilitiesperspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295-1318.
Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. K. (2009) Market size and intellectual property protection, International Economic Review, 50: 855–81.
Cepeda, G., & Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational ca- pabilities: Aknowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 426- 437.
Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innova- tion in developing countries. Journal of development economics, 78(2), 474-493.
Chen, W., R. Gouma, B. Los and M. Timmer (2017). Measuring the Income to Intangibles inGoods Production: A Global Value Chain Approach. WIPO Economic Research Working Paper No. 36. Geneva: WIPO.
Cho, K., Kim, C., & Shin, J. (2015). Differential effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic performance: A cross-industry in- vestigation. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 827-840.
Chong, A. Y., Chan, F. T., Ooi, K. B., & Sim, J. J. (2011). Can Malaysian firms improve organizational/innovation performance via SCM? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(3), 410-431.
Cirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The Innovation Paradox: Develo- ping-Country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-Up. World Bank Publications. World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-
-1160-9. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not) (No. w7552). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Eicher, T., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2008). Endogenous strength of inte- llectual property rights: Implications for economic development and growth. European Economic Review, 52(2), 237-258.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategicmanagement journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700-719.
Fidel, P., Schlesinger, W., & Cervera, A. (2015). Collaborating to innovate: Effects on customer knowledge management and performance. Journal of business research, 68(7), 1426 1428
Gallini, N.T.,2002.The economics of patents: lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. J.Econ.Perspect.16,131–154.
Grossman, G. and Lai, E. (2004) International protection of intellectual property, American Economic Review, 95: 1635–53.
Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H., 2001.The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RANDJ. Econ.32, 101– 128.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geográfica. (2015). Censos Económicos 2014 micro,pequeña, mediana, y gran empresa, estratificación de los establecimientos. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Recuperado de http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha. html?upc=702825077952
Ju, K. J., Park, B., & Kim, T. (2016). Causal Relationship between Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities, Technological Innovation, and Operatio- nal Performance. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(4), 6-15
Kanwar, S.,Evenson,R.,2003.Does intellectual property protection spur technological change? Oxford Econ. Pap.55,235–264.
KUMAR, N. (2003). Intellectual Property Rights, Technology and Economic Development. Economic and Political Weekly, 209.
Lemley, M. A. (2001). Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office. Boalt Working Papers in Public Law.
Kim, Y.K., Lee,K., Park,W.G., Choo,K.,2012.Appropriate intellectual proper- ty protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development. Res.Policy 41,358–375.
Mejía-Trejo, J., Sanchez-Gutiérrez, J., & Haro-Beas, J. F. (2014). Customer Knowledge to Improve the Innovation: The Relationship in México. The 13th International conference of the Society for Global Business & Economic development. Managing the “Intangibles”: Business and Entrepreneurship Perspectives in a Global Context. Universitá Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. July 16-18 2014. Facoltá di Economia “Giorgio Fua”, Piazzale Martelli, 8.
Murray,F.,Stern,S.,2007. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis J.Econ.Behav.Organ.63,648–687.
Neuhäusler, P.,2012.The use of patents and informal appropriation mechanisms — differences between sectors and among companies. Technovation 32,681–693.
OCDE (2017), Estudios económicos de la OCDE: México 2017, OCDE Publishing, París. DOE: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264269040-es.
OECD/ECLAC (2013), Perspectivas económicas de América Latina 2013: Polí- ticas de pymes para el cambio estructural, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/leo-2013-es
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-6.
Oslo Manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD/ European Communities, 2005. Third Ed. http://www.oecd.org/science/ inno/2367580.pdf
Pakes, A.,Griliches,Z.,1980.Patents and R& Datthe firm level:a first report. Econ. Lett. 5,377–381.
Park, W. G., & Ginarte, J. C. (1997). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(3), 51-61.
Prieto, I. M., Revilla, E., & Rodríguez-Prado, B. (2009). Building dynamic capabilities in product development: how do contextual antecedents matter?. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(3), 313-326.
Qian, Y. (2007) ‘Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment?. A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent Differential effects of intellectual property rights. 839 protection, 1978–2002’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89: 436–53.
Sweet, C. M., EterovicMaggio,D.S., 2015. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation? World Dev.66, 665–677.
Schneider, P. (2005) ‘International trade, economic growth, and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries’, Journal of Development Economics, 78: 529–47.
Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 509-533.
Thompson, M. A. and Rushing, F. W. (1996) An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on economic growth, Journal of Economic Development, 21: 61–79.
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 31-51 Wang, Z. & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
WIPO (2017). World Intellectual Property Report 2017: Intangible capital in global value chains. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. Woo, S., Jang, P., & Kim, Y. (2015). Effects of intellectual property rights and patented knowledge in innovation and industry value added: A multinational empirical analysis of different industries. Technovation, 43,49-63.
Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-17.
Downloads
Published
June 30, 2021
Series
Categories
Copyright (c) 2021 Edith Roque-Huerta, Juan Mejía-Trejo
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Details about this monograph
ISBN-13 (15)
978-607-571-156-0
doi
10.55965/abib.9786075711560.2021a
