Agentic artificial intelligence in higher education: A research study on applications, protocols, and academic traceability

Authors

Juan Mejía-Trejo
Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-1943

Keywords:

agentic artificial intelligence, higher education, evidence traceability, academic protocols

Synopsis

Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Research Study on Applications, Protocols, and Academic Traceability analyzes how agentic AI can support university processes without replacing human intelligence, student authorship, or faculty responsibility. Its main purpose is to explain what agentic AI is, distinguish it from generative AI, chatbots, assistants, and copilots, and propose criteria for its responsible use in higher education.

The book presents agentic AI as a support architecture capable of organizing complex academic tasks, such as designing learning activities, supporting students, assisting research, reviewing evidence, generating feedback, and strengthening academic traceability. Its approach is best understood as applied and procedural research, because it develops routes, protocols, and implementation criteria rather than an empirical validation based on field data.

Across its seven chapters, the book addresses the definition of agentic AI, its use in teaching and learning, academic research, university protocols, course tutoring, rubric-based assessment, and the management of learning evidence. Its central argument is that agentic AI has educational value when it improves understanding, documents processes, respects authorship, enables human supervision, and strengthens academic quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Mejía-Trejo, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México

Research Professor at the Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México

References

Abou Ali, M., & Dornaika, F. (2025). Agentic AI: A comprehensive survey of architectures, applications, and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11422-4

Arowosegbe, A. A., Alqahtani, J. S., & Oyelade, T. O. (2024). Perception of generative AI use in UK higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1463208. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1463208

Baptista, J. P. (2025). Human-made news vs. AI-generated news: A comparison of university students’ perceptions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04872-2

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), Article 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Cano, J. R., et al. (2024). Unlocking innovation: How enjoyment drives GenAI use in innovation courses. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1483853. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1483853

Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: The ChatGPT effect. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003459026

Dify. (n.d.). Agent node. Dify Docs. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://docs.dify.ai/en/use-dify/nodes/agent

Dify. (n.d.). Dify Docs: Introduction. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://docs.dify.ai/en/use-dify/getting-started/introduction

Dong, Y. (2026). Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-026-06903-y

EDUCAUSE. (2025). 2025 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2025/5/2025- educause-horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-edition

Farinosi, M., et al. (2025). To adopt or to ban? Student perceptions and use of generative AI in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05982-7

FlowiseAI. (n.d.). Agentflow V2. Flowise Docs. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://docs.flowiseai.com/using-flowise/agentflowv2

FlowiseAI. (n.d.). Flowise Docs: Introduction. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://docs.flowiseai.com/

FlowiseAI. (n.d.). Flowise GitHub repository. GitHub. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise

Gao, C., Lan, X., Li, N., Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Zhou, Z., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2024). Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1259. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03611-3

Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., & Zhang, X. (2024). Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2024/890

Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on support, replacement, and digital literacy. Education Sciences, 15(4), Article 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396

Higher Education Policy Institute, & Kortext. (2025). Student generative AI survey 2025. HEPI. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2025/02/26/student-generative-ai-survey-2025/

Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Ruseva, M., & Kabaivanov, S. (2025). A framework for generative AI-driven assessment in higher education. Information, 16(6), Article 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060472

Jisc. (2025). Student perceptions of generative AI. Jisc. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/student-perceptions-of-generative-ai

Juárez, R. (2025). Dynamic assessment with AI (Agentic RAG) and iterative feedback: A model for the digital transformation of higher education in the global EdTech ecosystem. Algorithms, 18(11), 712.

https://doi.org/10.3390/a18110712

Jukiewicz, M. (2025). How generative artificial intelligence transforms teaching and influences student wellbeing in future education. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1594572

Khlaif, Z. N., Alkouk, W. A., Salama, N., & Abu Eideh, B. (2025). Redesigning assessments for AI-enhanced learning: A framework for educators in the generative AI era. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020174

Langflow. (n.d.). Use Langflow agents. Langflow Docs. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://docs.langflow.org/agents

LangGenius. (n.d.). Dify GitHub repository. GitHub. Retrieved April 30, 2026, from https://github.com/langgenius/dify

Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221

Lodge, J. M. (2024). The evolving risk to academic integrity posed by generative artificial intelligence. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-08/evolving-risk-to-academic- integrity-posed-by-generative-artificial-intelligence.pdf

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile (NIST AI 600-1). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.600-1.pdf

OECD. (2023a). Emerging governance of generative AI in education. In OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook- 2023_c74f03de-en/full-report/emerging-governance-of-generative-ai-in- education_3cbd6269.html

OECD. (2023b). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449

OECD. (2024). AI, data governance and privacy: Synergies and areas of international co-operation. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/06/ai-data- governance-and-privacy_2ac13a42/2476b1a4-en.pdf

Pérez-Pérez, I. (2026). Transparency mechanisms for generative AI use in higher education. Computers, 15(2), Article 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020111

Ranieri, M., Biagini, G., & Cuomo, S. (2025). AI literacy in higher education: A systematic approach to questionnaire development and validation. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.388469

Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2025). AI agents vs. agentic AI: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges. Information Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599

Smerdon, D. (2024). AI in essay-based assessment: Student adoption, usage, and performance. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100288

Sousa, A. E., & Cardoso, P. (2025). Use of generative AI by higher education students. Electronics, 14(7), Article 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258

Taneja, S., Biswas, S. S., Alankar, B., & Kaur, H. (2025). Agentic RAG for personalized learning: Design of an AI-powered learning agent using open-source small language models. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 23(4), 69–80.

Thüs, D., et al. (2024). Exploring generative AI in higher education: A RAG system to enhance student engagement with scientific literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1474892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892

Toderas, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: A systematic review and critical analysis of AI applications, challenges, and future directions. Sustainability, 17(17), 8049.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178049

UNESCO. (2024a). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-students

UNESCO. (2024b). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391104

Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: Current status, issues, and prospects. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1183162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162

Zhu, H. (2025). Ethical risks of generative AI in education: A systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05252-6

Agentic artificial intelligence in higher education: A research study on applications, protocols, and academic traceability

Downloads

Published

May 16, 2026

Details about this monograph

ISBN-13 (15)

978-970-96061-2-6

doi

10.55965/abib.9789709606126